Indian Point – the nuclear bombshell in New York City’s backyard

Karl Grossman | The Ecologist

Following the accidental fire in a transformer at the troubled Indian Point nuclear site last weekend, and the unplanned release of oil into the Hudson River, calls are growing for the two remaining power plants to be shut down, writes Karl Grossman. The NRC is likely to extend its expiring licenses for another 20 years – but New York State could still refuse it a water use permit.

In 1976, Robert Pollard, a rarity among US government nuclear officials – honest and safety-committed – said of the Indian Point nuclear power station that it was “an accident waiting to happen.”

Pollard had been project manager at Indian Point for the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) from which he resigned at that time charging the NRC“suppresses the existence of unresolved safety questions and fails to resolve these problems.” He joined the Union of Concerned Scientists.

An explosion and fire at a transformer at Indian Point 3 on Saturday is but one of the many accidents that have occurred at the Indian Point facility through the years – none of them catastrophic as have been the disasters at the Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plants.

But Indian Point 2 has been in operation for 41 years – though when nuclear power was first advanced in the United States, plants were never seen as running for more than 40 years because of radioactivity embrittling metal parts and otherwise causing safety problems. So licenses were limited to 40 years.

Now, an application to extend the license for another 20 years

Since September 2013 Unit 2 has been runing without an operating license under a ‘Period of Extended Operation’ while the NRC considers an application before it from the plant’s owner, Entergy, to allow it to run another 20 years – which would, if approved, make 60 in total.

Indian Point 3, where the transformer explosion and fire occurred, has been operational for 39 years and its license expires this year. (Indian Point l was shut down early because of mechanical deficiencies.) Entergy also is seeking to have Indian Point 3’s operating license extended to 60 years.

These old, long problem-plagued nuclear plants, 26 miles up the Hudson River from New York City, are now disasters waiting to happen in a very heavily populated area. Some 22 million people live within 50 miles of the Indian Point site, which lies just 38 miles north of New York City.

“This plant is the nuclear plant that is closest to the most densely populated area on the globe”, declared New York Governor Andrew Cuomo at the Indian Point site on Sunday.

Cuomo, who has been pushing to have the Indian Point nuclear plants closed, noted that this was “not the first transformer fire” at them. And the concern is that “one situation is going to trigger another.”

Entergy PR people in recent days have stressed that the transformer explosion and fire occurred in the“non-nuclear part” of Indian Point 3. However, as Pollard noted in a television documentary, ‘Three Mile Island Revisited’ (see below), that I wrote and narrated on that accident, “there is no non-nuclear part of a nuclear plant.”

What could be the extent of a major accident at Indian Point?

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 1982 issued a report titled ‘Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences‘ or CRAC-2. The research for the report was done at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico.

CRAC-2 projects that in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident with breach of containment at Indian Point 2, there could be 46,000 ‘peak early fatalities’, 141,000 ‘peak early injuries’, 13,000 cancer deaths and a cost in property damages (in 1980 dollars) of $274 billion – which in today’s dollars would be $1 trillion.

For an accident at Indian Point 3 in which the transformer explosion and fire happened, because it is a somewhat bigger reactor (generating 1,025 megawatts compared to Indian Point 2’s 1,020) the impacts would be greater, said CRAC-2.

For Indian Point 3, in the event of a meltdown with breach of containment, CRAC-2 estimates 50,000 ‘peak early fatalities’, 167,000 ‘peak early injuries’, 14,000 cancer deaths and a cost in property damage at $314 billion.

‘One of the least favorable sites from an earthquake hazard and risk perspective’

Compounding the problem of the Indian Point plants being old – consider driving a 60 year-old car on a high-speed Interstate – they are at the intersection of the Ramapo and Stamford earthquake faults. As a 2008 study by seismologists at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory found:

“Indian Point is situated at the intersection of the two most striking linear features marking the seismicity and also in the midst of a large population that is at risk in case of an accident. This is clearly one of the least favorable sites in our study area from an earthquake hazard and risk perspective.”

“This aging dilapidated facility has endless problems leaking radioactive chemicals, oil and PCBs into the Hudson River. It’s unconscionable to permit the continued operation of Indian Point”, said Susan Hito-Shapiro, an environmental attorney and member of the leadership council of the Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition.

Further, she pointed out this week, Indian Point has been described as “the most attractive terrorist target” in the US because of its proximity to New York City and it also being seven miles from the US Military Academy at West Point.

Indeed the 9/11 terrorists may have considered crashing into Indian Point as a fallback target: both captured jets flew over the Indian Point nuclear station before striking the World Trade Center minutes later.

And just how do they propose to evacuate NYC?

And Hito-Shapiro described it as “outrageous” that the Federal Emergency Management Agency has approved an evacuation plan for Indian Point “although it would never work” in the event of an major accident at the plants considering the millions of people who stand to be affected.

The key to New York State’s strategy to shut down Indian Point is the denial by the state’s Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) to give Entergy a ‘Water Use Permit’ to let it continue to send many hundreds of millions of gallons of water a day from the nuclear plants into the Hudson River.

We need to make sure DEC stays strong”, says Hito-Shapiro.

In light of the historic, reckless, scandalous weakness of the federal government when it comes to Indian Point – and the nuclear power plants of other utilities – strong state action is most necessary.



Petition:Citizens Demand To Close Indian Point Nuclear Plant‘ by

Karl Grossman is professor of journalism at the State University of New York / College at Old Westbury, and the author of ‘Cover Up: What You Are Not Supposed to Know About Nuclear Power’ and host of the nationally-aired TV program ‘EnviroCloseup‘.

Join discussion: leave a comment